Journal Critique By Harsha Sooka

The introduction of the article starts off with why the record was conducted, due to the discovery of spring amongst patients who had used atomic number 64 based distinguish agents. Nephritic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) was the disease caused by the use of the gadolinium based furrow agent. Once again the introductions lacks literature on what this disease actually was or how the gadolinium based limit agent caused it. The mental hospital then goes Into the history of the different contrast agent and non-contrast agent magnetic vowel rhyme angiography methods.Then towards the supplant of the Introduction the alma of the explore that was conducted was mentioned, which Is a proper idea as It brings the reader, rump in to understanding as to why the research was conducted. Moving on to the following part which is the methods which was explained by the authors in more than detail as to what they exactly did to orbit the different patients, what ages and sexes of patients that took part in the research and how the research was in line with the ethics and law.Which is in fact a good start which to the methods, which shows the reader that the research was conducted ethically and according to law. The methods then go into how the psychoanalyze was equald with deferent sequences which argon AD OTF and a TRANCE covering the kidney and pelvic vessels, a AD OTF, a AD PC and a AD B-SSP covering the aortic bifurcation and pelvic vessels. The authors likewise mentioned what was outcome that was to be compared and also one type MR.. implement that was used In the whole study (Phelps 1.T Cochlea). The results contained the outcomes of the study, which were the quality of the image from the different sequences and also the factor of time taken for all(prenominal) of the sequence. Which was placed in tables and images and used to compare the treatment part of the article and towards the end of the result paragraph all the sequences were rank according to all ev aluated parameters. The end of discussion touched limitations and also gave advantage of victimisation non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.The ratiocination finishes off with the explanation as to how the authors are positive that Non-contrast enhanced MR.. Offers a base hit preoperative examination for assessment of pelvic vessel status before kidney trans- plantation without any risk of NSF, nonprescription or radiation. They also lastly touched as to which of the sequences were recommended and how Important It was do prevent much(prenominal) complications caused. This Is a nice short and aboveboard paragraph that does have a unanimous effect on the reader as to how their aim was successfully achieved and how