Terry J. Allen, “Reach Out and Track Someone ” Summary Essay Example for Free

Terry J. Allen, Reach verboten and Track Some wiz Summary EssayAllen discusses ethical and legal implications of prison cell phone tracking technology. He begins by noting how this technology benefits emergency responders tracing the source of 911 calls then moves to showing how cell phone pings confine been habitd to solve murder cases. Allen discusses how telecom companies and the government do not divulge the extent of their monitor activities and capabilities. The legality of wiretapping, collecting cell phone records, and tracing cell phones is already being debated. On one side of the debate are those that worry about protecting individuals privacy. On the some other side are those that find that taking the time to process a search warrant drop delay bringing criminals to justice. The author notes that the invasion of privacy is not just on the part of the government, that too in the hands of entrepreneurs searching to create profitable businesses. Article 2 Kate M acAulay, Technologys Peril and Potential, summary MacAulay compares and contrasts viewpoints of dickens authors, George Ritzer and Sherry Turkle, in order to examine how values and morals are ca utilisation my technology.Both authors make note of the negative effects of technology. For Ritzer these problems trickle down to the individual from a big societal movement (termed McDonaldization) whereas for Turkle technology poses a threat to an individuals self- identity operator and relationships with others. In examining the authors overall views on technological advancement, MacAulay finds that Ritzer is almost entirely pessimistic while Turkle has a more coercive, balanced view.As Ritzer and Turkle both warn of the dangers technology poses, MacAulay advocates that we become aware of these dangers in order to map this technology in a safe manner, ultimately finding a way to use technology to become better people. of import Themes The main theme that these writings share is the recognition of the power of technology to impact our lives, both for the positive and the negative. Allen and MacAulay are similar in that neither takes a one-sided view of the cut off they examine the issue from both sides.Allen, however, seems to be more cautionary in warning of the potential of the technology to infringe on peoples privacy. The writings differ with regard to the types of examples the authors use to illustrate their points. Allen uses information from diverse sources general advertisements, murder trials, government edicts, etc. His examples speak more directly to the reader. MacAulay, on the other hand, is comparing the views of 2 published authors, with whom the reader is most likely not familiar. How would Author A respond to Author B?Allen would largely agree with MacAulay but would likely argue that it is perhaps a bit to optimistic to yield individuals that much control over how they use technology. As he states, businesses and the government have the ca pabilities to monitor how we use technology. We cannot use technology entirely in a personal manner. My Own Views After reading these two texts, I agree with the authors that technological advances come with some strings attached (including loss of privacy). I in any case agree with MacAulays discussion of the implications of creating alternate virtual identities (with regards to Turkles writing).These writings have not so much changed my view on the subject as much as they have provided evidence bread and butter my pre-existent views. However, I was not aware of some of the legal implications of cell phone tracking discussed by Allen. This discussion raises the question of how laws must be changed or re-interpreted to deal with issues that result from technological advances. I had also never thought of these issues from a top-down approach (as MacAulay discusses with regards to the phenomenon of McDonaldization).Now, I see the main controversy as being who holds the responsibilit y for ensuring that technology is used responsibly. Is it the consumer? Is it the government? Is it the businesses that create the technology? Views I Wish to portion After much thought, I have come to realize that the regulation of technology cannot be leave to any one individual or group. These writings have given me greater understanding of the complexities of the issue, and as a user of technology, I am very much interested in ensuring that I use technology safely.The new perspective that I wish to share with my readers is that using technology is not ineluctably an individuals right. It is a privilege, and as a privilege, there are some conditions attached. If one is to use technology to create virtual identities different from ones own, one has to take responsibility for how that identity impacts ones relationship with the self and with others in real life. Similarly, if one chooses to use a cell phone, one has to understand that the possibility exists for the usage to be t racked.